|
Model Description
The Oklahoma Fire Danger Model, operational since 1996, is a prototype
next-generation model of the U.S. Forest Service's National Fire
Danger Rating System (NFDRS). Developed in conjunction with the
Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory of the U.S. Forest Service in
Missoula, Montana, this NFDRS model is the first to utilize a real-time
automated weather station network (the Oklahoma
Mesonet) rather than
once-per-day manual observations. The model also utilizes weekly
1-km resolution AVHRR satellite data for NDVI (Normalized Difference
Vegetative Index) to estimate the "relative greenness" of the earth's
surface, which is directly related to live fuel moisture. One kilometer
resolution colored maps of both "relative" and "visual" greenness
are available.
The Oklahoma Fire Danger (OKFD) Model produces 1-km resolution
colored maps of four NFDRS fire danger indices (dimensionless):
Spread Component (SC), Energy Release Component (ERC), Burning Index
(BI), and Ignition Component (IC). Colored maps of 1-hr dead fuel
moisture and the Keetch-Byram Drought Index (KBDI) are also produced,
the latter map once per day. In addition, for each model run, a
table of fire danger indices, fuel moistures, KBDI, and selected
weather variables is produced for each Mesonet site.
It is important to understand some of the limitations of the Oklahoma
Fire Danger Model:
1. Every 1-km "grid" square of Oklahoma has been assigned one
of five surface fuel models (so many tons/acre of 1-hr, 10-hr,
100-hr dead fuels, herbaceous and woody live fuels, etc.). If
the particular fuel model of concern (e.g, an open grassy area)
within a given grid square is not the same as the assigned fuel
model (e.g., a deciduous forest), then the OKFD Model results
for that 1-km square can be expected to be different from what
they would be for your fuel model of concern.
2. The OKFD Model, like the NFDRS, is only a surface-fuel based
model and does not apply to crown fires.
3. The Oklahoma Fire Danger Model assumes an NFDRS Slope Class
of 1 (terrain of 0-25% slope), so actual upslope conditions over
steep terrain will be amplified over OKFD predictions.
4. As can be inferred from the above, the OKFD Model is not designed
for specific fire behavior predictions for a given field, fuel
type, slope, etc., but rather for the predominant vegetative fuel
type over a 1-km square, mainly flat region.
5. The fuel models utilized are for native vegetation. Accordingly,
for 1-km grid squares of primarily agricultural cropland, the
OKFD predictions will not be accurate (e.g., fields of bare soil,
wheat fields, etc.). Nevertheless, live fuel moisture over such
grid squares will be a function of what the satellite "sees" (the
relative greenness maps). So in the sense that live fuel moisture
values strongly influence fire behavior, the OKFD predictions
for such squares will reflect reality, even though based on a
totally different fuel model. Thus, 1-km squares of green wheat
fields will show low fire danger, as they should. Bare soil areas,
on the other hand, will show high fire danger - in such cases,
OKFD predictions are erroneous, as there are no surface fuels
to burn.
6. Because the current Mesonet sensors are unable to detect the
presence of a snow cover, the OKFD output will be unreliable for
locations having a snow cover and should be ignored. After the
snow cover melts in such locations, model output will become valid
once again.
Fire Behavior and the Weather
In Oklahoma, as mentioned earlier, the OKFD Model uses one of
five surface fuel models (NFDRS Model A for shortgrass prairie;
L for mixed prairie and western cropland; T for tallgrass prairie
and eastern/central cropland; R for deciduous forests; and P for
pine forests). These models consist of so many tons/acre of 1-hr,
10-hr, and 100-hr dead fuels and live herbaceous and woody fuels.
Grassy fuel models, such as predominate in the panhandle and western
Oklahoma, contain only "fine" 1-hr dead (and live) fuels, while
forest fuel models such as are in eastern Oklahoma have equal amounts
of 1- and 10-hr fuels and a lesser amount of 100-hr fuels. In addition,
the 1988 revisions to the NFDRS include a "drought dead fuel load"
in the subsurface - increasing amounts of this fuel become available
(in the same proportions as the "non-drought" dead fuels) to burn
as the KBDI value increases above 100.
It is important to realize that fire initiation and behavior are
primarily determined by the current weather conditions, of which
solar radiation, temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed
are most important. Fine fuels (1-hr dead class) respond quickly
to changing weather conditions - the subsurface can be completely
saturated from a recent rain, but the surface fine fuels can have
very low fuel moisture and carry a fire. The fire danger indices
(especially SC and BI) are primarily a function of the current weather
conditions, even though fuel types with 10-hr and 100-hr components
are taken into account.
On the other hand, the Keetch-Byram Drought Index (KBDI) relates
to the moisture levels in the subsurface (litter, duff, and upper
soil layers). Increasing KBDI values add extra amounts of fuel to
the fuel load, but the moisture content of the 1-hr fuels is still
determined by current weather conditions. Thus, one can have extremely
high KBDI values, but if wind speeds are low and relative humidities
are high, there will be low fire danger. Conversely, one can have
very low KBDI values, but if wind speeds are high and relative humidities
low, there will be high fire danger. KBDI, because it is based on
the subsoil moisture profile, is also a fairly reliable indicator
of live fuel moisture. High KBDI values means the understory vegetation
is low in water content and susceptible to ignition with a minimum
of preheating.
Descriptions of SC, ERC, BI, IC, and KBDI
With these thoughts in mind, we now present some descriptions and
interpretations of the four fire danger indices (SC, ERC, BI, IC)
and of KBDI:
Spread Component
For fire control planning, the first consideration is the rate
of spread. The Spread Component (SC) is numerically equal to the
predicted rate of spread
of the headfire in feet/minute. It is the most variable of the
indices, with daily variations being caused by changes in wind
speed and in the dead and live fuel moisture contents.
SC = (1 min/ft)*(Rate of Spread in ft/min)
[MPH=0.0114*SC]
Energy Release Component
ERC is a measure of the heat released per unit area in the flaming
zone of the fire. It is the least variable index on a day-to-day
basis. Variations are caused by varying fuel moistures in the
fuel bed.
ERC = (0.04 ft**2/Btu) * (Heat Release in Btu/ft**2)
Burning Index
The fireline intensity, given by I, in Btu/ft-min is given by:
I = SC * ERC * (25 Btu/ft-min)
The larger this number, which is based on both SC and ERC, the
greater the difficulty of containment of the fire.
From this variable, a flame length (FL) relationship has been
developed:
FL (ft) = j(I/60)**0.46
Finally, the burning index (BI) is related to the flame length
as follows:
BI = k (FL), where k = 10/ft.
Or,
Flame Length (ft) = BI/10
Thus, the burning index contains information related to both
the fireline intensity and flame length. It is the most important
single fire danger index (besides fireline intensity I).
Ignition Component
The ignition component is the probability (0-100%) that a reportable
fire requiring suppression action will result from a firebrand.
It says nothing about the intensity of the fire.
Keetch-Byram Drought Index
Drought, as defined by the KBDI, is a condition of dryness in
the litter, duff, and upper soil layers that progresses from saturation
to an absence of available moisture. The KBDI is based on an arbitrary
8 inches of water in the litter/duff/soil column. When the full
8" of water are available, KBDI = 0. As water is removed from
the column by evapotranspiration, the KBDI increases in value.
When KBDI = 800, all the water has been removed. As a drought
proceeds, the upper soil layers dry and the amount of dead fuel
available for consumption increases. During combustion some of
this fuel contributes directly to fireline intensity (BI), but
most increases total heat release (ERC) and contributes to burn
severity through smoldering combustion with its resulting smoke.
The interpretations below are based on experience within forested
areas in the southeastern United States.
|
KBDI Value
|
Interpretations
|
|
0 - 200
|
Nearly all soil organic matter, duff, and litter are left
intact after a burn. Once the fire passes, remaining embers
extinguish quickly and, within a few minutes, the area is
completely extinguished and smoke free.
|
|
200 - 400
|
At these levels, litter and duff layers begin
to contribute to fire intensity. Heavier fuel classes can
become involved in the burn. Soil exposure is minimal. Smoke
management can become a real hazard, especially if there are
larger fuel classes available. Smoldering with resulting smoke
can carry into the night.
|
|
400 - 600
|
These levels represent the upper range at which
most understory type burning should be conducted. Most of
the duff and organic layers will ignite and actively burn.
The intensity can be expected to increase almost exponentially
from the lower to upper ends of this range. Considerable soil
exposure occurs. Complete consumption of all but the largest
dead fuels can be expected, and larger fuels not consumed
may smolder for several days, leading to smoke and possible
fire control problems.
|
|
600 - 800
|
These levels represent the most severe drought
conditions, and many states issue burning bans at these levels.
Prescribed fires should not even be attempted at levels over
700. Fires that do occur will be intense and deep-burning.
Live understory vegetation (2-3" range) should be considered
part of the fuel complex due to its low fuel moisture. Most
subsurface soil organic material will be consumed; great soil
exposure will occur with great future erosion potential. Smoldering
may occur for many days, with smoke and fire control problems.
|
Fire Suppression Interpretations
| CAUTION: These are not guides to personal safety. Fires
can be dangerous at any intensity. |
|
Flame Length
(ft)
|
Fireline Intensity
(Btu/ft/s)
|
Interpretations
|
|
<4
(BI <40)
|
<100
|
Fires can generally be attacked at the head or flanks by persons
using handtools.
Hand line should hold the fire.
|
|
4-8
(BI=40-80)
|
100-500
|
Fires are too intense for direct attack on the head by persons
using handtools.
Hand line cannot be relied on to hold fire.
Equipment such as dozers, pumpers, and retardant aircraft can
be effective.
|
|
8-11
(BI=80-110)
|
500-1,000
|
Fires may present serious control problems--torching out,
crowning, and spotting.
Control efforts at the fire head will probably be ineffective.
|
|
> 11
(BI > 110)
|
> 1,000
|
Crowning, spotting, and major fire runs are probable.
Control efforts at head of fire are ineffective. |
|